Background: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival rates of
immediately loaded implants after at least five years. Besides implant failure, the amount of …

Background Immediate loading of dental implants appears to be a successful option.
Questions still remain whether annual failure rates (AFR s) as well as annual marginal bone …

Immediate loading of oral implants has become popular because of the increasing demands
of a shortened treatment time. This literature review evaluates the prognosis of immediately …

Immediate loading of oral implants has been reported as a beneficial treatment protocol in
implant dentistry that increases the comfort of the patient. However, documentation in the …

Statement of problem Immediate loading of dental implants has gained widespread
popularity because of its advantages in shortening treatment duration and improving …

Purpose: To test whether there is a difference in success rates between immediately, early,
and conventionally loaded implants. Materials and Methods: All randomized controlled …

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of 1) immediate (within 1 week), early (between 1 week
to 2 months), and conventional (after 2 months) loading of osseointegrated implants, and of …

Objectives This systematic review aimed at answering the following PICO question: In
patients receiving immediate (Type 1) implant placement, how does immediate compare to …

Statement of problem Patients prefer to be rehabilitated as soon as possible if the risk of
implant failure is not increased. However, whether immediate loading of single implants is …

Our objective was to compare survival and peri-implant bone levels of immediately
nonocclusally vs early loaded implants in partially edentulous patients up to 12 months after …