This paper is a response to a recent paper by Bobier and Omelianchuk in which they argue
that the critics of Giubilini and Minerva's defence of infanticide fail to adequately justify a …

Giubilini and Minerva argue that the permissibility of abortion entails the permissibility of
infanticide. Proponents of what we refer to as the Birth Strategy claim that there is a morally …

In a recent paper, Giubilini and Minerva argue for the moral permissibility of what they call
'after-birth abortion', or infanticide. Here I suggest that they actually employ a confusion of …

Giubilini and Minerva ask why birth should be a critical dividing line between acceptable
and unacceptable reasons for terminating existence. Their argument is that birth does not …

In their controversial paper 'After-birth abortion', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide ('after …

In 'Dilemma for Appeals to the Moral Significance of Birth', we argued that a dilemma is
faced by those who believe that birth is the event at which infanticide is ruled out. Those who …

The argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns is a challenge to liberal
positions on abortion because it can be considered a reductio of their defence of abortion …

In their paper'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'Alberto Giubilini and Francesca
Minerva argue that because there are no significant differences between a fetus and a …

In 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?', Giubilini and Minerva argue that
infanticide should be permitted for the same reasons as abortion. In particular, they argue …

This is a response to Giubilini and Minerva arguing that, on the basis of the similar moral
status of the fetus and infant, infanticide is justifiable for many of the same reasons that justify …