Introduction Recommendations on chronic diseases management emphasise the need to
consider patient perspectives and shared decision-making. Discrepancies between patients …

Objective Patient‐physician discordance in global assessment of disease activity concerns
one‐third of patients, but what does it reflect? We aimed to assess patient‐physician …

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine if patient information needs are
being met and the level of patient satisfaction with rheumatology practitioners in participatory …

Objective Patients and physicians often differ in their perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
disease activity, as quantified by the patient's global assessment (PGA) and by the …

Introduction Effective communication between patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and their
physicians is important for optimizing treatment outcomes. We assessed the quality of …

Objective The integration of the patient in therapeutic decision‐making is important in the
management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the patient opinion regarding disease status …

Introduction Shared decision making is a collaborative process where patients and
clinicians work together to understand the patient's situation and to determine how best to …

Objective To assess the extent and determinants of discordance in scoring between patient
global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) in patients with …

Importance Patients and physicians often have differing opinions on the patient's disease
severity. This phenomenon, termeddiscordant severity grading (DSG), hinders the patient …

Background Patients with psoriasis face numerous treatment and self-management
decisions. Shared decision making is a novel approach where patients' preferences and …