Risk factors associated with use of coercive practices in adult mental health inpatients: A systematic review
L Beames, J Onwumere - Journal of psychiatric and mental …, 2022 - Wiley Online Library
L Beames, J Onwumere
Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2022•Wiley Online LibraryAccessible Summary What is known on the subject? Coercive practices such as restraint
(physically holding a person) or seclusion (containing a person in locked room) are
frequently used in mental health care. How often and which specific practices are used is not
consistent across different healthcare systems, hospitals or wards. Internationally, there is
agreement on the need to monitor and reduce the use of coercive practices. What this paper
adds to existing knowledge? The reviewed evidence suggests a number of different factors …
(physically holding a person) or seclusion (containing a person in locked room) are
frequently used in mental health care. How often and which specific practices are used is not
consistent across different healthcare systems, hospitals or wards. Internationally, there is
agreement on the need to monitor and reduce the use of coercive practices. What this paper
adds to existing knowledge? The reviewed evidence suggests a number of different factors …
Accessible Summary
What is known on the subject
- Coercive practices such as restraint (physically holding a person) or seclusion (containing a person in locked room) are frequently used in mental health care.
- How often and which specific practices are used is not consistent across different healthcare systems, hospitals or wards.
- Internationally, there is agreement on the need to monitor and reduce the use of coercive practices.
What this paper adds to existing knowledge
- The reviewed evidence suggests a number of different factors affect a person's risk of experiencing coercive practices, while admitted to a mental health ward.
- However, there is currently not enough high‐quality research evidence to say which factors are most important or how they work to influence the likelihood of a person experiencing coercive practice.
What are the implications for practice
- When carrying out risk assessments, mental health professionals must take into account that a number of different factors are important and explore these with the patient.
- Care plans aimed at minimizing the use of coercive practices, such as restraint, must be personalized and developed with the individual.
Abstract
Introduction
Coercive practices, such as physical restraint and seclusion, are a common feature of all mental healthcare systems. However, there is considerable variation in their use, concern about their iatrogenic potential and agreement internationally on the need to monitor and reduce their use.
Aims
To examine the evidence concerning risk factors associated with use of coercive practices in adults admitted to inpatient psychiatric services.
Method
A systematic review, consistent with PRIMSA guidelines, of four databases (PsychINFO, Medline, CINHAL and Embase). Peer‐reviewed, English language articles from database inception to February 2020 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.
Results
Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Risk factors examined in the studies organized around four categories: patient socio‐demographic; patient clinical; staff; and organizational factors. Overall, methodological quality of papers was deemed weak, and there was insufficient evidence to support any singular risk factor.
Discussion
The reviewed evidence suggests risk of coercive practice in inpatient mental health settings is multifactorial. Further research to standardize concept definitions and elucidate the mechanisms behind variance in use is required.
Implications for Practice
Assessment of patients at risk of coercive practice must take a multifactorial approach.
Wiley Online Library以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果