Purpose Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven to provide a good
survival benefit for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is limited information about …

BACKGROUND & AIMS:: Differences in efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and
surgical resection (SR) are not clear for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) …

Aim/Background: In HCC patients with multiple tumors in separate segments, monotherapy
with surgical resection is often difficult when the estimated residual liver volume after surgery …

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) for single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2 cm or less. Background: The optimal …

Background This study aimed to investigate whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an
alternative to surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the context of …

BACKGROUND Significant controversy exists as to which treatment modality is most
effective for small, solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs): radiofrequency ablation …

Objectives Restricted mean survival time (RMST) has been increasingly used to assess the
treatment effect. We aimed to evaluate a treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) …

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term therapeutic efficacy of
radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus that of surgical resection in small hepatocellular …

Objective Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective in treating hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) and less invasive than surgical resection. However,'one-off'complete tumor ablation …

Abstract Background About 10%-20% of all individuals who develop hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) do not have cirrhosis. Comparisons are rarely reported regarding the …