We aimed to investigate long-term (≥ 5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary …

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass graft …

Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the long‐term
outcomes of PCI compared to CABG in patients with LMCAD. Background Recent data from …

Despite the increase in use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left main
coronary disease, its efficacy compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is …

Aims The optimal revascularization strategy for left main coronary artery disease (LMD)
remains controversial, especially with two recent randomized controlled trials showing …

Background The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery
disease is still controversial. This is systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate …

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is historically regarded as the standard of care
for patients with significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. However, following …

Background It is not clear whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is as effective
and safe as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease. We …

Background The optimal revascularization technique in patients with left main coronary
artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the long-term …

The last few years have witnessed a heated debate within the cardiovascular community on
the most appropriate treatment for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD), mainly due to …