Nutritional science has generated a large and complex body of scientific knowledge, and
confusion and debate are widespread among the public, healthcare authorities, and …

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are useful tools in summarizing a large body of
evidence and informing policy and guidelines. Although findings from systematic reviews …

Decision making in nutrition is based on current available scientific evidence. However, we
are currently living in a time of highly accessible information, and with the increase in …

Evidence‐based practice merges the best and most relevant clinical research data with
clinician experience, pathophysiology of disease state, and the specifics of individual patient …

The knowledge and relevance of nutrition as well as the demand for well-funded advices
increase. The Cochrane Collaboration plays a leading role within the evidence-based …

Objectives To identify, describe, and map contemporary nutrition guidelines (NGs) from
reviews that used the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool …

ABSTRACT The USDA's Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team conducts food-
and nutrition-related systematic reviews used to inform US Federal guidelines and …

Decisions related to a spectrum of nutrition-related public health and clinical concerns must
consider many factors and are best informed by evaluating the totality and quality of the …

The clinical nutrition case study is a neglected area of activity and publication. This may be
in part because it is not regarded as a serious contributor to evidence-based nutrition (EBN) …

Background Evidence-based clinical research poses special barriers in the field of nutrition.
The present review summarises the main barriers to research in the field of nutrition that are …