The right not to know is a contested matter. This can be because the inversion of the normal
framing of entitlement to information about one's own health is thought to be illogical and …

The right not to know is a contested matter. This can be because the inversion of the normal
framing of entitlement to information about one's own health is thought to be illogical and …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so‐called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so-called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so-called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so-called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

The right not to know is a contested matter. This can be because the inversion of the normal
framing of entitlement to information about one's own health is thought to be illogical and …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so‐called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

This article argues for the importance of conceptual clarity in the debate about the so-called
right not to know. This is vital both at the theoretical and the practical level. It is suggested …

The right not to know is a contested matter. This can be because the inversion of the normal
framing of entitlement to information about one's own health is thought to be illogical and …