Bicommutators Of Cofaithful, Fully Divisible Modules*: Corrigendum

JA Beachy - Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 1974 - cambridge.org
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …
被引用次数：3 相关文章

BICOMMUTATORS OF COFAITHFUL, FULLY DIVISIBLE MODULES*: CORRIGENDUM

Can. J. Math, 1974 - johnabeachy.com
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …

BICOMMUTATORS OF COFAITHFUL, FULLY DIVISIBLE MODULES*: CORRIGENDUM

Can. J. Math, 1974 - researchgate.net
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …

BICOMMUTATORS OF COFAITHFUL, FULLY DIVISIBLE MODULES*: CORRIGENDUM

Can. J. Math, 1974 - scholar.archive.org
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …

BICOMMUTATORS OF COFAITHFUL, FULLY DIVISIBLE MODULES*: CORRIGENDUM

Can. J. Math, 1974 - academia.edu
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …

BICOMMUTATORS OF COFAITHFUL, FULLY DIVISIBLE MODULES*: CORRIGENDUM

Can. J. Math, 1974 - researchgate.net
It has been pointed out to me by EA Rutter that Proposition 2.4 (i) is incorrect in that the proof
does not establish the uniqueness of the QM (R)-module structure defined on RN.(Notation …