Cost‐effectiveness versus cost–utility analysis of interventions for cancer: does adjusting for health‐related quality of life really matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - Wiley Online Library
ABSTRACT Objective: The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost‐Effectiveness has
recommended the use of quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate …

[HTML][HTML] Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost–Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - valueinhealthjournal.com
Abstract Objective The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has
recommended the use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate …

Cost-effectiveness versus cost-utility analysis of interventions for cancer: does adjusting for health-related quality of life really matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health: the Journal of the International Society …, 2004 - europepmc.org
Objective The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended the
use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …

Cost-effectiveness versus cost-utility analysis of interventions for cancer: does adjusting for health-related quality of life really matter?

TO Tengs - Value in health: the journal of the International …, 2004 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Objective The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended the
use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …

[PDF][PDF] Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost–Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004 - core.ac.uk
ABSTRACT Objective: The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has
recommended the use of qualityadjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate …

Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost-Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - elibrary.ru
Objective: The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended the
use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …

[HTML][HTML] Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost–Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended
the use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …

Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost–Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - infona.pl
The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended the use of
quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …

[引用][C] Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost-Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Dose Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

T TO - Value Health, 2004 - cir.nii.ac.jp
Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost-Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer : Dose Adjusting
for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter? | CiNii Research CiNii 国立情報学研究所 …

Cost-Effectiveness versus Cost-Utility Analysis of Interventions for Cancer: Does Adjusting for Health-Related Quality of Life Really Matter?

TO Tengs - Value in Health, 2004 - psycnet.apa.org
Abstract The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness has recommended the
use of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the best way to estimate outcomes in a cost …