Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
SJ Edwards, MJ Clarke, S Wordsworth… - International journal of …, 2009 - Wiley Online Library
Background: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head‐to‐head studies are unlikely …
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head‐to‐head studies are unlikely …
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
SJ Edwards, M Clarke, S Wordsworth… - International Journal of …, 2009 - pure.qub.ac.uk
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled
trials — Queen's University Belfast Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main …
trials — Queen's University Belfast Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main …
[引用][C] Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
SJ EDWARDS, MJ CLARKE… - … journal of clinical …, 2009 - pascal-francis.inist.fr
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled
trials CNRS Inist Pascal-Francis CNRS Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases Simple …
trials CNRS Inist Pascal-Francis CNRS Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases Simple …
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
S Edwards, M Clarke, S Wordsworth… - International journal of …, 2009 - ora.ox.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely …
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely …
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
SJ Edwards, MJ Clarke… - … Journal of Clinical …, 2009 - search.ebscohost.com
Background: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely …
between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely …
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
SJ Edwards, MJ Clarke, S Wordsworth… - International Journal of …, 2009 - europepmc.org
Background Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between
the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have …
the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have …
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
SJ Edwards, MJ Clarke… - … journal of clinical …, 2009 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between
the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have …
the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have …