Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients

CP MCDonalD, VC Chang, MC MCDonalD… - … of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2014 - thejns.org
Object Cervical arthroplasty with an artificial disc (AD) has emerged as an alternative to
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical spondylosis …

[PDF][PDF] Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 …

CP MCDonalD, VC Chang, MC MCDonalD - J Neurosurg: Spine, 2014 - researchgate.net
Results. There was no difference in total neck motion comparing ACDF and AD replacement
for neck extension (43.3±10.2 vs 44.3±12.6, p= 0.866) and rotation (36.0±6.5 vs 38.2±9.3 …

Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients

CP McDonald, V Chang, M McDonald… - Journal of …, 2013 - europepmc.org
Methods Ten patients who underwent C5-6 ACDF and 7 who underwent C5-6 AD
replacement were enrolled. Using biplanar fluoroscopy and a model-based track technique …

Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients

CP McDonald, V Chang… - Journal of …, 2014 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Object Cervical arthroplasty with an artificial disc (AD) has emerged as an alternative to
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical spondylosis …

[PDF][PDF] Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 …

CP MCDonalD, VC Chang, MC MCDonalD - J Neurosurg: Spine, 2014 - researchgate.net
Results. There was no difference in total neck motion comparing ACDF and AD replacement
for neck extension (43.3±10.2 vs 44.3±12.6, p= 0.866) and rotation (36.0±6.5 vs 38.2±9.3 …