Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis

L Rudmik, R Leung - JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck …, 2014 - jamanetwork.com
Importance Intractable epistaxis is a common otolaryngology emergency. Transnasal
endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (TESPAL) and endovascular arterial embolization …
被引用次数：54 相关文章

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis

L Rudmik, R Leung - JAMA otolaryngology--head & neck …, 2014 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Importance Intractable epistaxis is a common otolaryngology emergency. Transnasal
endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (TESPAL) and endovascular arterial embolization …
[PDF] academia.edu

[PDF][PDF] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation vs Arterial Embolization for Intractable Epistaxis

L Rudmik, R Leung - 2014 - academia.edu
OBJECTIVE To aid in decision making by evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TESPAL vs
endovascular arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND …

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.

L Rudmik, R Leung - JAMA Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery, 2014 - europepmc.org
Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization
for intractable epistaxis. - Abstract - Europe PMC Sign in | Create an account https://orcid.org …
[PDF] researchgate.net

[PDF][PDF] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation vs Arterial Embolization for Intractable Epistaxis

L Rudmik, R Leung - 2014 - researchgate.net
OBJECTIVE To aid in decision making by evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TESPAL vs
endovascular arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND …