How to interpret antiphospholipid laboratory tests

KMJ Devreese - Current Rheumatology Reports, 2020 - Springer
KMJ Devreese
Current Rheumatology Reports, 2020Springer
Abstract Purpose of the Review This review focuses on the laboratory tests necessary for the
diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). For the interpretation of the results of the
tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), understanding of all pitfalls and interferences is
necessary. Recent Findings Progress has been made on the standardization of aPL tests
and current guidelines for detection of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies
(aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) are useful tools. LAC measurement …
Purpose of the Review
This review focuses on the laboratory tests necessary for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). For the interpretation of the results of the tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), understanding of all pitfalls and interferences is necessary.
Recent Findings
Progress has been made on the standardization of aPL tests and current guidelines for detection of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) are useful tools. LAC measurement remains a complex procedure with many pitfalls and interference by anticoagulant therapy. Solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI still show inter-assay differences. Measuring LAC, aCL, and aβ2GPI allows making antibody profiles that help in identifying patients at risk. Other aPL, such as antibodies against domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I (aDI) and antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients, but are not included in the current diagnostic criteria as no added value in the diagnosis of APS has been illustrated so far.
Summary
The laboratory diagnosis of APS remains challenging. LAC, aCL, aβ2GPI IgG, and IgM should be performed to increase diagnostic efficacy, with an integrated interpretation of all results and an interpretative comment. A close interaction between clinical pathologists and clinicians is mandatory.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果