Accuracy of ultrasound subjective 'pattern recognition'for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors

J Yazbek, KS Raju, J Ben‐Nagi… - … in Obstetrics and …, 2007 - Wiley Online Library
J Yazbek, KS Raju, J Ben‐Nagi, T Holland, K Hillaby, D Jurkovic
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of …, 2007Wiley Online Library
Objectives To assess the value of pattern recognition for the preoperative ultrasound
diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). Methods This was a prospective study of
women who were referred to our regional cancer center with the diagnosis of an adnexal
mass on a Level II (routine) gynecological ultrasound scan. Women with lesions of uncertain
nature were referred for a Level III (expert) ultrasound scan in our tertiary center. The tumor
pattern recognition method was used to differentiate between various types of ovarian …
Objectives
To assess the value of pattern recognition for the preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs).
Methods
This was a prospective study of women who were referred to our regional cancer center with the diagnosis of an adnexal mass on a Level II (routine) gynecological ultrasound scan. Women with lesions of uncertain nature were referred for a Level III (expert) ultrasound scan in our tertiary center. The tumor pattern recognition method was used to differentiate between various types of ovarian tumors. Morphological features suggestive of BOTs were: unilocular cyst with a positive ovarian crescent sign and extensive papillary projections arising from the inner wall, or a cyst with a well defined multilocular nodule. The ultrasound findings were compared with the final histological diagnosis.
Results
A total of 224 women with an adnexal mass of uncertain nature were referred for an expert scan, 166 (74.1%) of whom underwent surgery. In this group of women the final histological diagnoses were: 99 (60%) benign lesions, 32 (19%) invasive ovarian cancer and 35 (21%) BOTs. Using pattern recognition combining the different morphological features, a correct preoperative diagnosis of BOT was made in 24/35 (68.6%) women: area under the receiver–operating characteristics curve 0.812 (standard error 0.049; 95% CI, 0.716–0.908), sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52–0.81), specificity 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88–0.97), positive likelihood ratio 11.3 (95% CI, 5.53–22.8) and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (95% CI, 0.21–0.55).
Conclusions
Ultrasound diagnosis of BOTs is highly specific. However, typical features are absent in one‐third of cases, which are typically misdiagnosed as benign lesions. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果