Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional analysis of a 20 000-patient database in Spain
Journal of hypertension, 2007•journals.lww.com
Objective To evaluate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters in a broad
sample of high-risk hypertensive patients. Methods The Spanish Society of Hypertension is
developing a nationwide project in which more than 900 physicians send ABPM registries
and corresponding clinical records to a central database via www. cardiorisc. com. Between
June 2004 and July 2005 a 20 000-patient database was obtained; 17 219 were valid for
analysis. Results We identified 6534 patients with high cardiovascular risk according to the …
sample of high-risk hypertensive patients. Methods The Spanish Society of Hypertension is
developing a nationwide project in which more than 900 physicians send ABPM registries
and corresponding clinical records to a central database via www. cardiorisc. com. Between
June 2004 and July 2005 a 20 000-patient database was obtained; 17 219 were valid for
analysis. Results We identified 6534 patients with high cardiovascular risk according to the …
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters in a broad sample of high-risk hypertensive patients.
Methods
The Spanish Society of Hypertension is developing a nationwide project in which more than 900 physicians send ABPM registries and corresponding clinical records to a central database via www. cardiorisc. com. Between June 2004 and July 2005 a 20 000-patient database was obtained; 17 219 were valid for analysis.
Results
We identified 6534 patients with high cardiovascular risk according to the 2003 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines stratification score. Office blood pressure (BP) was 158.8/89.9 mmHg and 24-h BP was 135.8/77.0 mmHg. Patients with grade 3 BP in the office showed ambulatory systolic BP values less than 160 mmHg in more than 80%. A non-dipping pattern was observed in 3836 cases (58.7%), whereas this abnormality was present in 47.9% of patients with low-to-moderate risk [odds ratio (OR) 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–1.64]. The prevalence of non-dippers was higher as ambulatory BP increased (≈ 70% when 24-h systolic BP> 155 mmHg) and was similar in both groups. At the lowest levels of BP (24-h systolic BP< 135 mmHg) a non-dipping pattern was more prevalent in high-risk cases (56.6 versus 45.7%; OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.40–1.64).
Conclusion
There was a remarkable discrepancy between office and ambulatory BP in high-risk hypertensive patients. The prevalence of a non-dipper BP pattern was almost 60%. In the lowest levels of ambulatory BP, high-risk patients showed a higher prevalence of non-dipping BP than lower-risk cases. These observations support the recommendation of a wider use of ABPM in high-risk hypertensive patients.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果