An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer
Formal university technology transfer mechanisms, through licensing agreements, research
joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the
academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the
propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents
empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by
faculty members: transfer of commercial technology, joint publications with industry …
joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the
academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the
propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents
empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by
faculty members: transfer of commercial technology, joint publications with industry …
Abstract
Formal university technology transfer mechanisms, through licensing agreements, research joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by faculty members: transfer of commercial technology, joint publications with industry scientists, and industrial consulting. We find that male, tenured and research-grant active faculty members are more likely to engage in all three forms of informal technology transfer.
Oxford University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果