Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis: comparison of shear wave elastography and transient elastography

SB Paul, P Das, M Mahanta, V Sreenivas, S Kedia… - Abdominal …, 2017 - Springer
SB Paul, P Das, M Mahanta, V Sreenivas, S Kedia, N Kalra, H Kaur, M Vijayvargiya…
Abdominal Radiology, 2017Springer
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) and
transient elastography (TE) in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and
C (CHC) patients taking liver biopsy as gold standard. Methods Ethics committee approved
this prospective cross-sectional study. Between October 2012 and December 2014,
consecutive CHB/CHC patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included—age more than
18 years, informed written consent, willing and suitable for liver biopsy. SWE, TE, and biopsy …
Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) and transient elastography (TE) in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and C (CHC) patients taking liver biopsy as gold standard.
Methods
Ethics committee approved this prospective cross-sectional study. Between October 2012 and December 2014, consecutive CHB/CHC patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included—age more than 18 years, informed written consent, willing and suitable for liver biopsy. SWE, TE, and biopsy were performed the same day. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) cut-offs for various stages of fibrosis were generated for SWE and TE. AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were estimated individually or in combination.
Results
CH patients (n = 240, CHB 172, CHC 68), 176 males, 64 females, mean age 32.6 ± 11.6 years were enrolled. Mean LSM of patients with no histological fibrosis (F0) was 5.0 ± 0.7 and 5.1+1.4 kPa on SWE and TE, respectively. For differentiating F2 and F3–4 fibrosis on SWE, at 7.0 kPa cut-off, the sensitivity was 81.3% and specificity 77.6%. For TE, at 8.3 kPa cut-off, sensitivity was 81.8% and specificity 83.1%. For F3 vs. F4, SWE sensitivity was 83.3% and specificity 90.7%. At 14.8 kPa cut-off, TE showed similar sensitivity (83.3%) but specificity increased to 96.5%. Significant correlation between SWE and TE was observed (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). On combining SWE and TE, a drop in sensitivity with increased specificity for all stages of liver fibrosis occured.
Conclusion
SWE is an accurate technique for evaluating liver fibrosis. SWE compares favorably with TE especially for predicting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. Combining SWE and TE further improves specificity.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果