Authorship attribution vs. adversarial authorship from a liwc and sentiment analysis perspective

J Gaston, M Narayanan, G Dozier… - … symposium series on …, 2018 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
J Gaston, M Narayanan, G Dozier, DL Cothran, C Arms-Chavez, M Rossi, MC King, J Xu
2018 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI), 2018ieeexplore.ieee.org
Although Stylometry has been effectively used for Authorship Attribution, there is a growing
number of methods being developed that allow authors to mask their identity [2, 13]. In this
paper, we investigate the usage of non-traditional feature sets for Authorship Attribution. By
using non-traditional feature sets, one may be able to reveal the identity of adversarial
authors who are attempting to evade detection from Authorship Attribution systems that are
based on more traditional feature sets. In addition, we demonstrate how GEFeS (Genetic & …
Although Stylometry has been effectively used for Authorship Attribution, there is a growing number of methods being developed that allow authors to mask their identity [2, 13]. In this paper, we investigate the usage of non-traditional feature sets for Authorship Attribution. By using non-traditional feature sets, one may be able to reveal the identity of adversarial authors who are attempting to evade detection from Authorship Attribution systems that are based on more traditional feature sets. In addition, we demonstrate how GEFeS (Genetic & Evolutionary Feature Selection) can be used to evolve high-performance hybrid feature sets composed of two non-traditional feature sets for Authorship Attribution: LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry & Word Count) and Sentiment Analysis. These hybrids were able to reduce the Adversarial Effectiveness on a test set presented in [2] by approximately 33.4%.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果