Benchmarking long-read RNA-sequencing analysis tools using in silico mixtures

X Dong, MRM Du, Q Gouil, L Tian, JS Jabbari… - Nature …, 2023 - nature.com
X Dong, MRM Du, Q Gouil, L Tian, JS Jabbari, R Bowden, PL Baldoni, Y Chen, GK Smyth
Nature Methods, 2023nature.com
The lack of benchmark data sets with inbuilt ground-truth makes it challenging to compare
the performance of existing long-read isoform detection and differential expression analysis
workflows. Here, we present a benchmark experiment using two human lung
adenocarcinoma cell lines that were each profiled in triplicate together with synthetic,
spliced, spike-in RNAs (sequins). Samples were deeply sequenced on both Illumina short-
read and Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read platforms. Alongside the ground-truth …
Abstract
The lack of benchmark data sets with inbuilt ground-truth makes it challenging to compare the performance of existing long-read isoform detection and differential expression analysis workflows. Here, we present a benchmark experiment using two human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines that were each profiled in triplicate together with synthetic, spliced, spike-in RNAs (sequins). Samples were deeply sequenced on both Illumina short-read and Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read platforms. Alongside the ground-truth available via the sequins, we created in silico mixture samples to allow performance assessment in the absence of true positives or true negatives. Our results show that StringTie2 and bambu outperformed other tools from the six isoform detection tools tested, DESeq2, edgeR and limma-voom were best among the five differential transcript expression tools tested and there was no clear front-runner for performing differential transcript usage analysis between the five tools compared, which suggests further methods development is needed for this application.
nature.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References