Boundary representations for families of representations of operator algebras and spaces
MA Dritschel, SA McCullough - Journal of Operator Theory, 2005 - JSTOR
MA Dritschel, SA McCullough
Journal of Operator Theory, 2005•JSTORIn analogy with the peak points of the Shilov boundary of a uniform algebra, Arveson defined
the notion of boundary representations among the completely contractive representations of
a unital operator algebra. However, he was unable to show that such representations
always exist. Dropping his original condition that such representations should be irreducible,
we show that a family of representations (in Agler's sense) of either an operator algebra or
an operator space has boundary representations. This leads to a direct proof of Hamana's …
the notion of boundary representations among the completely contractive representations of
a unital operator algebra. However, he was unable to show that such representations
always exist. Dropping his original condition that such representations should be irreducible,
we show that a family of representations (in Agler's sense) of either an operator algebra or
an operator space has boundary representations. This leads to a direct proof of Hamana's …
In analogy with the peak points of the Shilov boundary of a uniform algebra, Arveson defined the notion of boundary representations among the completely contractive representations of a unital operator algebra. However, he was unable to show that such representations always exist. Dropping his original condition that such representations should be irreducible, we show that a family of representations (in Agler's sense) of either an operator algebra or an operator space has boundary representations. This leads to a direct proof of Hamana's result that all unital operator algebras have enough such boundary representations to generate the C*-envelope.
JSTOR
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果