Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: Optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost
L Chai, CM Saffron - Applied Energy, 2016 - Elsevier
Applied Energy, 2016•Elsevier
In the present study, the biomass upgrading depot capacity and biomass feedstock moisture
were optimized to obtain the minimum production cost at the depot gate for the production of
woody biofuels. Three technology scenarios are considered in this study:(1) conventional
pellets (CP),(2) modestly torrefied pellets (TP1) and (3) severely torrefied pellets (TP2). TP1
has the lowest cost of $7.03/GJ LHV at a moisture of 33 wt.% and a depot size of 84 MW
LHV. The effects of climatic conditions and biomass field conditions were also studied for …
were optimized to obtain the minimum production cost at the depot gate for the production of
woody biofuels. Three technology scenarios are considered in this study:(1) conventional
pellets (CP),(2) modestly torrefied pellets (TP1) and (3) severely torrefied pellets (TP2). TP1
has the lowest cost of $7.03/GJ LHV at a moisture of 33 wt.% and a depot size of 84 MW
LHV. The effects of climatic conditions and biomass field conditions were also studied for …
Abstract
In the present study, the biomass upgrading depot capacity and biomass feedstock moisture were optimized to obtain the minimum production cost at the depot gate for the production of woody biofuels. Three technology scenarios are considered in this study: (1) conventional pellets (CP), (2) modestly torrefied pellets (TP1) and (3) severely torrefied pellets (TP2). TP1 has the lowest cost of $7.03/GJLHV at a moisture of 33 wt.% and a depot size of 84 MWLHV. The effects of climatic conditions and biomass field conditions were also studied for three scenarios. In humid regions of Michigan, TP2 is more economical than other scenarios because of the increased production of combustible gas. The three scenarios have similar sensitivities to biomass field conditions.
Elsevier