Contrastive losses and solution caching for predict-and-optimize

M Mulamba, J Mandi, M Diligenti, M Lombardi… - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2020 - arxiv.org
arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.05354, 2020arxiv.org
Many decision-making processes involve solving a combinatorial optimization problem with
uncertain input that can be estimated from historic data. Recently, problems in this class
have been successfully addressed via end-to-end learning approaches, which rely on
solving one optimization problem for each training instance at every epoch. In this context,
we provide two distinct contributions. First, we use a Noise Contrastive approach to motivate
a family of surrogate loss functions, based on viewing non-optimal solutions as negative …
Many decision-making processes involve solving a combinatorial optimization problem with uncertain input that can be estimated from historic data. Recently, problems in this class have been successfully addressed via end-to-end learning approaches, which rely on solving one optimization problem for each training instance at every epoch. In this context, we provide two distinct contributions. First, we use a Noise Contrastive approach to motivate a family of surrogate loss functions, based on viewing non-optimal solutions as negative examples. Second, we address a major bottleneck of all predict-and-optimize approaches, i.e. the need to frequently recompute optimal solutions at training time. This is done via a solver-agnostic solution caching scheme, and by replacing optimization calls with a lookup in the solution cache. The method is formally based on an inner approximation of the feasible space and, combined with a cache lookup strategy, provides a controllable trade-off between training time and accuracy of the loss approximation. We empirically show that even a very slow growth rate is enough to match the quality of state-of-the-art methods, at a fraction of the computational cost.
arxiv.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果