Craniofacial Defects and Osseointegrated Implants: Six-Year Follow-up Report on the Success Rates of Craniofacial Implants at UCLA.

E Roumanas, R Nishimura, J Beumer… - … Journal of Oral & …, 1994 - search.ebscohost.com
E Roumanas, R Nishimura, J Beumer, P Moy, M Weinlander, J Lorant
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 1994search.ebscohost.com
This report is based upon 6 years of experience with craniofacial implants used for the
retention of maxillofacial prostheses. A total of 30 patients were treated with 92 implants. Of
these implants, 86 were uncovered, 8 were subsequently buried because of persistent soft
tissue problems, and 15 failed to achieve or maintain osseointegration. The overall success
rate was 73.3% and varied according to implant location and radiation status. The temporal
bone was the most reliable site (92.5%), followed by the nasal floor (72.2%), and lastly the …
Abstract
This report is based upon 6 years of experience with craniofacial implants used for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses. A total of 30 patients were treated with 92 implants. Of these implants, 86 were uncovered, 8 were subsequently buried because of persistent soft tissue problems, and 15 failed to achieve or maintain osseointegration. The overall success rate was 73.3% and varied according to implant location and radiation status. The temporal bone was the most reliable site (92.5%), followed by the nasal floor (72.2%), and lastly the orbit (65.0%). Most notably, the success rate for the irradiated orbital group was a low 58.3%.
search.ebscohost.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果