Effect of CannEpil® on simulated driving performance and co-monitoring of ocular activity: A randomised controlled trial
Journal of psychopharmacology, 2023•journals.sagepub.com
Background: Medicinal cannabis products containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are
increasingly accessible. Yet, policy guidelines regarding fitness to drive are lacking, and
cannabinoid-specific indexations of impairment are underdeveloped. Aims: To determine
the impact of a standardised 1 mL sublingual dose of CannEpil®, a medicinal cannabis oil
containing 100 mg cannabidiol (CBD) and 5 mg THC on simulated driving performance,
relative to placebo and whether variations in vehicle control can be indexed by ocular …
increasingly accessible. Yet, policy guidelines regarding fitness to drive are lacking, and
cannabinoid-specific indexations of impairment are underdeveloped. Aims: To determine
the impact of a standardised 1 mL sublingual dose of CannEpil®, a medicinal cannabis oil
containing 100 mg cannabidiol (CBD) and 5 mg THC on simulated driving performance,
relative to placebo and whether variations in vehicle control can be indexed by ocular …
Background
Medicinal cannabis products containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are increasingly accessible. Yet, policy guidelines regarding fitness to drive are lacking, and cannabinoid-specific indexations of impairment are underdeveloped.
Aims
To determine the impact of a standardised 1 mL sublingual dose of CannEpil®, a medicinal cannabis oil containing 100 mg cannabidiol (CBD) and 5 mg THC on simulated driving performance, relative to placebo and whether variations in vehicle control can be indexed by ocular activity.
Methods
A double-blind, within-subjects, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial assessed 31 healthy fully licensed drivers (15 male, 16 female) aged between 21 and 58 years (M = 38.0, SD = 10.78). Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), standard deviation of speed (SDS) and steering variability were assessed over time and as a function of treatment during a 40 min simulated drive, with oculomotor parameters assessed simultaneously. Oral fluid and plasma were collected at 30 min and 2.5 h.
Results
CannEpil did not significantly alter SDLP across the full drive, although increased SDLP was observed between 20 and 30 min (p < 0.05). CannEpil increased SDS across the full drive (p < 0.05), with variance greatest at 20–30 min (p < 0.001). CannEpil increased fixation duration (p < 0.05), blink rate (trend p = 0.051) and decreased blink duration (p < 0.001) during driving. No significant correlations were observed between biological matrices and performance outcomes.
Conclusions
CannEpil impairs select aspects of vehicle control (speed and weaving) over time. Alterations to ocular behaviour suggest that eye tracking may assist in determining cannabis-related driver impairment or intoxication. Australian and New Zealand Clinician Trials Registry, https://anzctr.org.au(ACTRN12619000932167).
Sage Journals