[HTML][HTML] Effect of route of administration on the efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine in PDAC mice
American journal of cancer research, 2020•ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It is unknown whether the route of administration impacts dendritic cell (DC)-based
immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared the effect of
intraperitoneal (ip), subcutaneous (sc), and intratumoral (it) administration of DC vaccine on
induction of antitumor responses in a KPC mouse model of PDAC. Histological analysis and
flow cytometry were used to evaluate tumor progression and antitumor immunity after
different routes of DC vaccination. Using a flank mouse model of PDAC, we found that the it …
immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared the effect of
intraperitoneal (ip), subcutaneous (sc), and intratumoral (it) administration of DC vaccine on
induction of antitumor responses in a KPC mouse model of PDAC. Histological analysis and
flow cytometry were used to evaluate tumor progression and antitumor immunity after
different routes of DC vaccination. Using a flank mouse model of PDAC, we found that the it …
Abstract
It is unknown whether the route of administration impacts dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared the effect of intraperitoneal (ip), subcutaneous (sc), and intratumoral (it) administration of DC vaccine on induction of antitumor responses in a KPC mouse model of PDAC. Histological analysis and flow cytometry were used to evaluate tumor progression and antitumor immunity after different routes of DC vaccination. Using a flank mouse model of PDAC, we found that the it route of DC vaccination had no significant effect on tumor growth rates compared with ip and sc routes (ip 6.66±2.58% vs sc 6.79±1.36% vs it 8.57±2.36%; P= 0.33). However, in an orthotopic PDAC model, ip injection of DC vaccine effectively suppressed tumor growth, inhibited tumor progression, and increased antitumor immunity compared with sc vaccination (tumor weight: ip 71.60±15.55 mg vs control 200.40±53.04 mg; P= 0.048; sc 151.40±41.64 mg vs control 200.40±53.04 mg; P= 0.49). Our study suggests that immunization via an ip route results in superior antitumor immune response and tumor suppression when compared with other routes.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果