Ideological bias in social psychological research
Social psychology and politics, 2015•taylorfrancis.com
According to Funder et al.(2013)“getting it right” is the sine qua non of science. Science can
tolerate individual mistakes and fl awed theor-ies, but only if it has reliable mechanisms for
correction. Unfortunately, science is not always self-correcting (eg, Ioannidis, 2012;
MacCoun, 1998; Nickerson, 1998). Equally unfortunately, although the potential political
distortion of psychology has been recognized for some time (MacCoun, 1998; Redding,
2001; Tetlock, 1994), calls for corrective action have gone largely unheeded.
tolerate individual mistakes and fl awed theor-ies, but only if it has reliable mechanisms for
correction. Unfortunately, science is not always self-correcting (eg, Ioannidis, 2012;
MacCoun, 1998; Nickerson, 1998). Equally unfortunately, although the potential political
distortion of psychology has been recognized for some time (MacCoun, 1998; Redding,
2001; Tetlock, 1994), calls for corrective action have gone largely unheeded.
According to Funder et al. (2013) “getting it right” is the sine qua non of science. Science can tolerate individual mistakes and fl awed theor-ies, but only if it has reliable mechanisms for correction. Unfortunately, science is not always self-correcting (e.g., Ioannidis, 2012 ; MacCoun, 1998 ; Nickerson, 1998 ). Equally unfortunately, although the potential political distortion of psychology has been recognized for some time (MacCoun, 1998 ; Redding, 2001 ; Tetlock, 1994 ), calls for corrective action have gone largely unheeded.
taylorfrancis.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果