We recently demonstrated that the perceived stability of a visual target that is displaced during a saccade critically depends on whether the target is present immediately when the saccade ends; blanking a target during and just after a saccade makes its intra-saccadic displacement more visible (Deubel et al. Vis Res 1996;36:985–996). Here, we investigate the interaction of visual context and blanking. Subjects saw a saccade target and an equal-sized distractor. During a saccade one or the other was displaced left or right. At the same time, one of the objects could be blanked briefly. Subjects reported whether the target or the distractor had jumped. The object that was blanked was more often seen as jumping (Experiment 1), regardless of which object really jumped, implying that continuously visible objects are preferentially perceived as stable. When both objects were blanked, longer blanking led to better accuracy at identifying which had jumped during a saccade. When one object was jumped and the other, stationary object was blanked (Experiment 2), the blanked object was mistakenly seen as jumping until the jump covered 50% or more of the saccade amplitude. In Experiment 3 a large continuously present texture underwent an undetected jump during a saccade, biasing judgments of simultaneous jumps of a blanked target. The results demonstrate that space constancy in normal situations is dominated by the assumption that a continuously present pattern is stable—this pattern becomes the spatial reference for the post-saccadic recalibration of perceptual space.