Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting: directional bremsstrahlung splitting
I Kawrakow, DWO Rogers, BRB Walters - Medical physics, 2004 - Wiley Online Library
I Kawrakow, DWO Rogers, BRB Walters
Medical physics, 2004•Wiley Online LibraryThe introduction into the BEAMnrc code of a new variance reduction technique, called
directional bremsstrahlung splitting (DBS), is described. DBS uses a combination of
interaction splitting for bremsstrahlung, annihilation, Compton scattering, pair production
and photoabsorption, and Russian Roulette to achieve a much better efficiency of photon
beam treatment head simulations compared to the splitting techniques already available in
BEAMnrc (selective bremsstrahlung splitting, SBS, and uniform bremsstrahlung splitting …
directional bremsstrahlung splitting (DBS), is described. DBS uses a combination of
interaction splitting for bremsstrahlung, annihilation, Compton scattering, pair production
and photoabsorption, and Russian Roulette to achieve a much better efficiency of photon
beam treatment head simulations compared to the splitting techniques already available in
BEAMnrc (selective bremsstrahlung splitting, SBS, and uniform bremsstrahlung splitting …
The introduction into the BEAMnrc code of a new variance reduction technique, called directional bremsstrahlung splitting (DBS), is described. DBS uses a combination of interaction splitting for bremsstrahlung, annihilation, Compton scattering, pair production and photoabsorption, and Russian Roulette to achieve a much better efficiency of photon beam treatment head simulations compared to the splitting techniques already available in BEAMnrc (selective bremsstrahlung splitting, SBS, and uniform bremsstrahlung splitting, UBS). In a simulated photon beam ( field) photon fluence efficiency in the beam using DBS is over 8 times higher than with optimized SBS and over 20 times higher than with UBS, with a similar improvement in electron fluence efficiency in the beam. Total dose efficiency in a central‐axis depth‐dose curve improves by a factor of 6.4 over SBS at all depths in the phantom. The performance of DBS depends on the details of the accelerator being simulated. At higher energies, the relative improvement in efficiency due to DBS decreases somewhat, but is still a factor of 3.5 improvement over SBS for total dose efficiency using DBS in a simulated photon beam. Increasing the field size of the simulated beam to (broad beam) causes the relative efficiency improvement of DBS to decrease by a factor of but is still up to 7 times more efficient than with SBS.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果