[HTML][HTML] Neoadjuvant therapy and major arterial resection for potentially reconstructable arterial involvement by stage 3 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

BPT Loveday, N Zilbert, PE Serrano, K Tomiyama… - HPB, 2019 - Elsevier
BPT Loveday, N Zilbert, PE Serrano, K Tomiyama, A Tremblay, AM Fox, M Segedi
HPB, 2019Elsevier
Background Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is defined by arterial
involvement. This study objective was to evaluate outcomes for patients with stage 3 PDAC
with potentially reconstructable arterial involvement, considered for neoadjuvant therapy
(NAT) and pancreatic resection, and to compare outcomes following arterial (AR) and non-
arterial resection (NAR). Methods This study included patients from 2009 to 2016 with
biopsy-proven stage 3 PDAC who were offered NAT before surgical exploration. AR was …
Background
Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is defined by arterial involvement. This study objective was to evaluate outcomes for patients with stage 3 PDAC with potentially reconstructable arterial involvement, considered for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreatic resection, and to compare outcomes following arterial (AR) and non-arterial resection (NAR).
Methods
This study included patients from 2009 to 2016 with biopsy-proven stage 3 PDAC who were offered NAT before surgical exploration. AR was performed if required to achieve R0 resection. Time to event outcomes were analysed from diagnosis date.
Results
87/89 patients (97.8%) received NAT (chemotherapy 41.6%, chemotherapy/radiotherapy 56.2%). 46/89 (51.7%) underwent exploration; 31 underwent resection (AR n = 20, NAR n = 11). AR patients had longer operative time (681 vs. 563 min, p = 0.006) and more blood loss (1600 vs. 575 mL, p = 0.0004), with no difference for blood transfusion, pancreatic fistula, length of stay, reoperation, or mortality. R0 rate was 30/31. Post-resection 90-day mortality was 3.2%. Median overall survival was statistically comparable between the AR and NAR groups (19.7 vs. 28.4 months, p = 0.41).
Conclusions
AR had comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to NAR. Following careful selection and non-progression after NAT, major AR may cautiously be considered if required to obtain a negative resection margin.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果