Outcome of acute pancreatic and peripancreatic collections occurring in patients with acute pancreatitis

M Manrai, R Kochhar, V Gupta, TD Yadav… - Annals of …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
M Manrai, R Kochhar, V Gupta, TD Yadav, N Dhaka, N Kalra, SK Sinha, N Khandelwal
Annals of surgery, 2018journals.lww.com
Objective: To study the outcome of acute collections occurring in patients with acute
pancreatitis Background: There are limited data on natural history of acute collections
arising after acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: Consecutive patients of AP admitted between
July 2011 and December 2012 were evaluated by imaging for development of acute
collections as defined by revised Atlanta classification. Imaging was repeated at 1 and 3
months. Spontaneous resolution, evolution, and need for intervention were assessed …
Abstract
Objective:
To study the outcome of acute collections occurring in patients with acute pancreatitis
Background:
There are limited data on natural history of acute collections arising after acute pancreatitis (AP).
Methods:
Consecutive patients of AP admitted between July 2011 and December 2012 were evaluated by imaging for development of acute collections as defined by revised Atlanta classification. Imaging was repeated at 1 and 3 months. Spontaneous resolution, evolution, and need for intervention were assessed.
Results:
Of the 189 patients, 151 patients (79.9%) had acute collections with severe disease and delayed hospitalization being predictors of acute collections. Thirty-six patients had acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis, 8 of whom developed acute peripancreatic fluid collections, of which 1 evolved into pseudocyst. Among the 153 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis, 143 (93.4%) developed acute necrotic collection (ANC). Twenty-three of 143 ANC patients died, 21 had resolved collections, whereas 84 developed walled-off necrosis (WON), with necrosis> 30%(P= 0.010) and Computed Tomographic Severity Index score≥ 7 (P= 0.048) predicting development of WON. Of the 84 patients with WON, 8 expired, 53 patients required an intervention, and 23 were managed conservatively. Independent predictors of any intervention among all patients were Computed Tomographic Severity Index score≥ 7 (P< 0.001) and interval between onset of pain to hospitalization> 7 days (P= 0.04).
Conclusions:
Patients with severe AP and delayed hospitalization more often develop acute collections. Pancreatic pseudocysts are a rarity in acute interstitial pancreatitis. A majority of patients with necrotising pancreatitis will develop ANC, more than half of whom will develop WON. Delay in hospitalization and higher baseline necrosis score predict need for intervention.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果