Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries
HA Prentice, M Lind, C Mouton, A Persson… - British journal of sports …, 2018 - bjsm.bmj.com
British journal of sports medicine, 2018•bjsm.bmj.com
Objective Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry
studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with
different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to
describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. Methods Five
European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR
registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified …
studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with
different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to
describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. Methods Five
European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR
registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified …
Objective
Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries.
Methods
Five European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions, medians and IQRs. Revision incidence rates following primary ACLR were computed.
Results
101 125 ACLR were included: 21 820 in Denmark, 300 in Luxembourg, 17 556 in Norway, 30 422 in Sweden, 2972 in the UK and 28 055 in the US. In all six cohorts, males (range: 56.8%–72.4%) and soccer injuries (range: 14.1%–42.3%) were most common. European countries mostly used autografts (range: 93.7%–99.7%); allograft was most common in the US (39.9%). Interference screw was the most frequent femoral fixation in Luxembourg and the US (84.8% and 42.9%), and suspensory fixation was more frequent in the other countries (range: 43.9%–75.5%). Interference was the most frequent tibial fixation type in all six cohorts (range: 64.8%–98.2%). Three-year cumulative revision probabilities ranged from 2.8% to 3.7%.
Conclusions
Similarities in patient demographics and injury activity were observed between all cohorts of ACLR. However, graft and fixation choices differed. Revision rates were low. This work, including >100 000 ACLR, is the most comprehensive international description of contemporary practice to date.
bjsm.bmj.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果