Performance analysis of machine learning classifiers for ASD screening

AS Halibas, LB Reazol, EGT Delvo… - … on Innovation and …, 2018 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
AS Halibas, LB Reazol, EGT Delvo, JC Tibudan
2018 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for …, 2018ieeexplore.ieee.org
Several machine learning classifiers have been used for Autism Spectrum Disorder
screening, however, literature in finding the best classifier for this application domain is
inadequate. Hence, this paper presents a comparison of five (5) supervised machine
learning algorithms: Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, k-nn, Random Tree, and Deep Learning
using small datasets (n= 1100) on child, adolescent and adult ASD screening in finding the
most appropriate classifier. These algorithms, which are evaluated using a broad set of …
Several machine learning classifiers have been used for Autism Spectrum Disorder screening, however, literature in finding the best classifier for this application domain is inadequate. Hence, this paper presents a comparison of five (5) supervised machine learning algorithms: Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, k-nn, Random Tree, and Deep Learning using small datasets (n=1100) on child, adolescent and adult ASD screening in finding the most appropriate classifier. These algorithms, which are evaluated using a broad set of prediction performance metrics including accuracy, precision/recall measures, and Receiver Operating Characteristics, are compared against each other. The experiment result suggests that the Deep Learning classifier gives the best performance (with more than 96%) in almost all metrics while the Random Tree classifier came out as the least performing classifier in all the performance metrics.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果