Predicting the outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage using machine learning techniques

P de Toledo, PM Rios, A Ledezma… - IEEE Transactions …, 2009 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2009ieeexplore.ieee.org
Background: Outcome prediction for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) helps guide care and
compare global management strategies. Logistic regression models for outcome prediction
may be cumbersome to apply in clinical practice. Objective: To use machine learning
techniques to build a model of outcome prediction that makes the knowledge discovered
from the data explicit and communicable to domain experts. Material and methods: A
derivation cohort (n= 441) of nonselected SAH cases was analyzed using different …
Background
Outcome prediction for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) helps guide care and compare global management strategies. Logistic regression models for outcome prediction may be cumbersome to apply in clinical practice.
Objective
To use machine learning techniques to build a model of outcome prediction that makes the knowledge discovered from the data explicit and communicable to domain experts. Material and methods: A derivation cohort ( n = 441) of nonselected SAH cases was analyzed using different classification algorithms to generate decision trees and decision rules. Algorithm used were C4.5, fast decision tree learner, partial decision trees, repeated incremental pruning to produce error reduction, nearest neighbor with generalization, and ripple down rule learner. Outcome was dichotomized in favorable [Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) = I-II] and poor (GOS = III-V). An independent cohort ( n = 193) was used for validation. An exploratory questionnaire was given to potential users (specialist doctors) to gather their opinion on the classifier and its usability in clinical routine.
Results
The best classifier was obtained with the C4.5 algorithm. It uses only two attributes [World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) and Fisher's scale] and leads to a simple decision tree. The accuracy of the classifier [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.84; confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.88] is similar to that obtained by a logistic regression model (AUC = 0.86; CI = 0.83-0.89) derived from the same data and is considered better fit for clinical use.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果