过去一年中添加的文章,按日期排序

Responsiveness of the Indonesian Versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee …

R Deviandri, HC der Veen, AMT Lubis… - … journal of sports …, 2023 - journals.sagepub.com
R Deviandri, HC der Veen, AMT Lubis, MJ Postma, I van den Akker-Scheek
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023journals.sagepub.com
330 天前 - Background: The Indonesian versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to
Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee
form (IKDC), and the Lysholm scores are considered valid and reliable for Indonesian-
speaking patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Purpose/Hypothesis: The
purpose of this study was to determine the responsiveness of the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and
Lysholm scores in an Indonesian-speaking population with ACL injury. It was hypothesized …
Background
The Indonesian versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form (IKDC), and the Lysholm scores are considered valid and reliable for Indonesian-speaking patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
Purpose/Hypothesis
The purpose of this study was to determine the responsiveness of the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores in an Indonesian-speaking population with ACL injury. It was hypothesized that they would have good responsiveness.
Study Design
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods
Between March 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, patients with an ACL injury at a single hospital in Indonesia were asked to complete the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores before either reconstruction surgery or nonoperative treatment. At 6 months after treatment, the patients completed all 3 scores a second time, plus a global rating of change question. The distribution-based and the anchor-based methods were used to study responsiveness. For each scale, the standardized response mean, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and minimal detectable change (MDC; at the group [MDCgr] and individual [MDCind] levels) for each scale were determined.
Results
Of 80 eligible patients, 75 (93.8%) completed the study. The standardized response means for the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores were 1.59, 1.72, and 1.51, respectively, indicating good responsiveness. The MCIDs for the ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores were 6.8, 7.8, and 4.8, respectively; all MCIDs were larger than that of the MDCgr (1.1, 0.7, and 0.6, respectively). At the individual level, the MCID for the IKDC was larger than the MDCind (7.8 vs 5.8). However, the MCIDs for ACL-RSI and Lysholm scores were smaller than those of the MDCind (6.8 vs 10.9 and 4.8 vs 5.1, respectively).
Conclusion
The Indonesian ACL-RSI, IKDC, and Lysholm scores indicated good responsiveness and can be used in the follow-up of patients after ACL injury, especially at the group level. In individual patients, IKDC was found to be more efficient than the ACL-RSI or Lysholm scores for detecting clinically important changes over time after ACL treatment.
Sage Journals