Solution Processable Fluorenyl Hexa‐peri‐hexabenzocoronenes in Organic Field‐Effect Transistors and Solar Cells

WWH Wong, TB Singh, D Vak, W Pisula… - Advanced Functional …, 2010 - Wiley Online Library
WWH Wong, TB Singh, D Vak, W Pisula, C Yan, X Feng, EL Williams, KL Chan, Q Mao…
Advanced Functional Materials, 2010Wiley Online Library
The organization of organic semiconductor molecules in the active layer of organic
electronic devices has important consequences to overall device performance. This is due to
the fact that molecular organization directly affects charge carrier mobility of the material.
Organic field‐effect transistor (OFET) performance is driven by high charge carrier mobility
while bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells require balanced hole and electron transport. By
investigating the properties and device performance of three structural variations of the …
Abstract
The organization of organic semiconductor molecules in the active layer of organic electronic devices has important consequences to overall device performance. This is due to the fact that molecular organization directly affects charge carrier mobility of the material. Organic field‐effect transistor (OFET) performance is driven by high charge carrier mobility while bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells require balanced hole and electron transport. By investigating the properties and device performance of three structural variations of the fluorenyl hexa‐peri‐hexabenzocoronene (FHBC) material, the importance of molecular organization to device performance was highlighted. It is clear from 1H NMR and 2D wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (2D WAXS) experiments that the sterically demanding 9,9‐dioctylfluorene groups are preventing π–π intermolecular contact in the hexakis‐substituted FHBC 4. For bis‐substituted FHBC compounds 5 and 6, π–π intermolecular contact was observed in solution and hexagonal columnar ordering was observed in solid state. Furthermore, in atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments, nanoscale phase separation was observed in thin films of FHBC and [6,6]‐phenyl‐C61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) blends. The differences in molecular and bulk structural features were found to correlate with OFET and BHJ solar cell performance. Poor OFET and BHJ solar cells devices were obtained for FHBC compound 4 while compounds 5 and 6 gave excellent devices. In particular, the field‐effect mobility of FHBC 6, deposited by spin‐casting, reached 2.8 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s and a power conversion efficiency of 1.5% was recorded for the BHJ solar cell containing FHBC 6 and PC61BM.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果