[HTML][HTML] Surgical treatment of tricuspid valve insufficiency promotes early reverse remodeling in patients with axial-flow left ventricular assist devices

S Maltais, Y Topilsky, V Tchantchaleishvili… - The Journal of thoracic …, 2012 - Elsevier
S Maltais, Y Topilsky, V Tchantchaleishvili, SH McKellar, LA Durham, LD Joyce, RC Daly…
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2012Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: The HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) continuous-flow left
ventricular assist device has emerged as the standard of care for patients with advanced
heart failure. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and early effectiveness of
concomitant tricuspid valve procedures in patients undergoing implantation of a HeartMate II
device. METHODS: From February 2007 to April 2010, 83 patients underwent HeartMate II
left ventricular assist device implantation. Of these, 37 patients had concomitant tricuspid …
OBJECTIVE
The HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device has emerged as the standard of care for patients with advanced heart failure. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and early effectiveness of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures in patients undergoing implantation of a HeartMate II device.
METHODS
From February 2007 to April 2010, 83 patients underwent HeartMate II left ventricular assist device implantation. Of these, 37 patients had concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (32 repairs, 5 replacements) for severe tricuspid regurgitation. The effects of a tricuspid valve procedure on tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular remodeling were assessed comparing echocardiographic findings at baseline and 30 days after left ventricular assist device implantation. Overall survival was also compared.
RESULTS
Patients undergoing a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure had more tricuspid regurgitation (vena contracta, 5.6 ± 2.1 mm vs 2.9 ± 2.0 mm; P < .001), worse right ventricular dysfunction (right ventricular end-diastolic area, 33.6 ± 6.2 mm vs 31.6 ± 8.5 mm; P = .05), higher mean right atrial pressure (17.4 ± 7.1 mm Hg vs 14.9 ± 5.1 mm Hg; P = .03), and a higher Kormos score (2.6 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 1.4; P = .0008) preoperatively. One month after surgery, tricuspid regurgitation was worse in patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation alone (+18.6%), whereas it improved significantly in patients undergoing a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure (−50.2%) (P = .005). A corresponding significant reduction in right ventricular end-diastolic area (33.6% ± 6.2% vs 30.1% ± 9.7%; P = .03) and a trend toward better right ventricular function (55.5% ± 79.7% vs 35.7% ± 60.5%; P = .28) were noted in patients undergoing a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure. Survival was comparable between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation, a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure effectively reduces tricuspid regurgitation and promotes reverse remodeling of the right ventricle.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果