The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning

L Radford - Semiotics in mathematics education, 2008 - brill.com
Semiotics in mathematics education, 2008brill.com
This chapter sketches a theory of teaching and learning that takes its inspiration from some
anthropological and historico-cultural schools of knowledge—the theory of knowledge
objectification. Within this theory, the problem of learning is formulated in such a way that
rationalist or individualists views of cognition and social interaction are avoided. The theory
of knowledge objectification posits, indeed, the problem of learning as a social process
through which students become progressively conversant with cultural forms of reflection …
This chapter sketches a theory of teaching and learning that takes its inspiration from some anthropological and historico-cultural schools of knowledge—the theory of knowledge objectification. Within this theory, the problem of learning is formulated in such a way that rationalist or individualists views of cognition and social interaction are avoided. The theory of knowledge objectification posits, indeed, the problem of learning as a social process through which students become progressively conversant with cultural forms of reflection. Arising in the course of sensuous mediated cultural praxes embedded in historically formed epistemes and ontologies, learning, it is argued, is not just about knowing something but also about becoming someone. The formulation of learning as a process where knowing and being are mutually constitutive leads to a non-utilitarian conception of the classroom: entrenched in unerasable ethical concerns, the classroom appears as a space for the growth of intersubjectivity and the nurturing of what is called here the communal self.
The chapter is divided into six sections. In the first section, I discuss some problematic assumptions often adopted by many contemporary theories of teaching and learning, in particular assumptions related to the learner, the content to be learned and process of learning. In Section 2, I introduce a non-mentalist, culturally embedded, concept of thinking that neither reduces the thinking subject to the mere product of discursive structures, nor posits it as a culturally-detached res cogitans. Section 3 is devoted to a discussion of the epistemological and ontological bases of the cultural theory here advocated. The concepts of learning and the mathematical classroom portrayed in this theory are presented in Sections 4 and 5, respectively. The main ideas of the previous sections are brought together in Section 6, where the educational questions surrounding the ethics of being and knowing are discussed.
brill.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果