Colloborative governance increasingly involves a major role in implementing major policy drives in localities. Understanding how the stakeholders may provide value is therefore essential to understanding collaborative governance practically. This research aims to analyzing the goal impact of collaborative governance in the implementation of" Segoro Amarto'as a social movement to poverty alleviation in Yogyakarta. A qualitative descriptive approach is used to explore data about the role between actors, the collaborative process carried out, and the goals achievements of collaborative governance in segoro amarto. The measurement of the goals achievement of Segoro Amarto uses indicators as follows: the type of network structure, commitment to the goals, trust between stakeholders, governance, access to authority, accountability and responsibility, information delivery, and access to resources. However, the results of collaborative governance in the implementation of the Segoro Amarto movement in Yogyakarta City have not yet represented the construction of integrative and holistic collaboration between actors because there is still a dominance of the role of the government and the dependence on the government in implementing poverty alleviation programs from the Segoro Amarto Movement. The implementation of the Segoro Amarto movement adopted top down policy from the Yogyakarta Government, so that efforts to empower the community tend to be only in the form of implementing partial governments programs. The involvement of the private sector and non-governmental organizations has not been fully involved. The Good results are found in aspects of commitment to goals, trust between actors, delivery of information, accountability and resposibility. Whereas, the results that are still not good are found in the aspects of network structure, access to authority, access to resources and governance. The failrure to achieve the results of collaborative governance in the Segoro Amarto implementation can be influenced by the dynamics of the problems which include:(1) There are differences in understanding, character and mindset of the implementing actors and the community,(2) the lack of moral will and political will in a holistic way to build awareness of each actor in strengthening social capital,(3) The culture of the community to depend on government assistance and the habit of receiving assistance in the form of money from the government to the community hampers the process of empowering the community,(4) Authority in decision making and budget allocations that are too tiered thus hampering in the process of implementing Segoro Amarto.