[PDF][PDF] Treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study

MK Erol, M Kayıkçıoğlu, M Kılıçkap, A Güler, A Yıldırım… - 2020 - jag.journalagent.com
MK Erol, M Kayıkçıoğlu, M Kılıçkap, A Güler, A Yıldırım, F Kahraman, V Can, S İnci…
2020jag.journalagent.com
Objective: Delayed admission of myocardial infarction (MI) patients is an important
prognostic factor. In the present nationwide registry (TURKMI-2), we evaluated the treatment
delays and outcomes of patients with acute MI during the Covid-19 pandemic and
compaired with a recent pre-pandemic registry (TURKMI-1). Methods: The pandemic and
pre-pandemic studies were conducted prospectively as 15-day snapshot registries in the
same 48 centers. The inclusion criteria for both registries were aged≥ 18 years and a final …
Objective: Delayed admission of myocardial infarction (MI) patients is an important prognostic factor. In the present nationwide registry (TURKMI-2), we evaluated the treatment delays and outcomes of patients with acute MI during the Covid-19 pandemic and compaired with a recent pre-pandemic registry (TURKMI-1).
Methods: The pandemic and pre-pandemic studies were conducted prospectively as 15-day snapshot registries in the same 48 centers. The inclusion criteria for both registries were aged≥ 18 years and a final diagnosis of acute MI (AMI) with positive troponin levels. The only difference between the 2 registries was that the pre-pandemic (TURKMI-1) registry (n= 1872) included only patients presenting within the first 48 hours after symptom-onset. TURKMI-2 enrolled all consecutive patients (n= 1113) presenting with AMI during the pandemic period. Results: A comparison of the patients with acute MI presenting within the 48-hour of symptom-onset in the pre-pandemic and pandemic registries revealed an overall 47.1% decrease in acute MI admissions during the pandemic. Median time from symptom-onset to hospital-arrival increased from 150 min to 185 min in patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI) and 295 min to 419 min in patients presenting with non-STEMI (NSTEMI)(p-values< 0.001). Door-to-balloon time was similar in the two periods (37 vs. 40 min, p= 0.448). In the pandemic period, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased, especially in the NSTEMI group (60.3% vs. 47.4% in NSTEMI, p< 0.001; 94.8% vs. 91.1% in STEMI, p= 0.013) but the decrease was not significant in STEMI patients admitted within 12 hours of symptom-onset (94.9% vs. 92.1%; p= 0.075). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly increased during the pandemic period [4.8% vs. 8.9%; p< 0.001; age-and sex-adjusted Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.96 (1.20–3.22) for NSTEMI, p= 0.007; and 2.08 (1.38–3.13) for STEMI, p< 0.001]. Conclusion: The present comparison of 2 nationwide registries showed a significant delay in treatment of patients presenting with acute MI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PCI was performed in a timely fashion, an increase in treatment delay might be responsible for the increased risk of MACE. Public education and establishing COVID-free hospitals are necessary to overcome patients' fear of using healthcare services and mitigate the potential complications of AMI during the pandemic.(Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 334-42)
jag.journalagent.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果