Unreliable tracking ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ system for changes in stroke volume after fluid administration in patients with high systemic …

JH Chin, WJ Kim, JH Choi, YA Han, SO Kim, WJ Choi - PLoS One, 2015 - journals.plos.org
JH Chin, WJ Kim, JH Choi, YA Han, SO Kim, WJ Choi
PLoS One, 2015journals.plos.org
Background The FloTrac/Vigileo™ system does not thoroughly reflect variable arterial tones,
due to a lack of external calibration. The ability of this system to measure stroke volume and
track its changes after fluid administration has not been fully evaluated in patients with the
high systemic vascular resistance that can develop during laparoscopic surgery. Methods In
42 patients undergoing laparoscopic prostatectomy, the stroke volume derived by the third-
generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (SV-Vigileo), the stroke volume measured using …
Background
The FloTrac/Vigileo system does not thoroughly reflect variable arterial tones, due to a lack of external calibration. The ability of this system to measure stroke volume and track its changes after fluid administration has not been fully evaluated in patients with the high systemic vascular resistance that can develop during laparoscopic surgery.
Methods
In 42 patients undergoing laparoscopic prostatectomy, the stroke volume derived by the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system (SV-Vigileo), the stroke volume measured using transesophageal echocardiography (SV-TEE) as a reference method, and total systemic vascular resistance were evaluated before and after 500 ml fluid administration during pneumoperitoneum combined with the Trendelenburg position.
Results
Total systemic vascular resistance was 2159.4 ± 523.5 dyn·s/cm5 before fluid administration. The SV-Vigileo was significantly higher than the SV-TEE both before (68.8 ± 15.9 vs. 57.0 ± 11.0 ml, P < 0.001) and after (73.0 ± 14.8 vs. 64.9 ± 12.2 ml, P = 0.003) fluid administration. During pneumoperitoneum combined with the Trendelenburg position, Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures showed a 53.8% of percentage error between the SV-Vigileo and the SV-TEE. Four-quadrant plot (69.2% of a concordance rate) and polar plot analysis (20.6° of a mean polar angle, 16.4° of the SD of a polar angle, and ±51.5° of a radial sector containing 95% of the data points) did not indicate a good trending ability of the FloTrac/Vigileo system.
Conclusions
The third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system may not be useful in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, based on unreliable performance in measuring the stroke volume and in tracking changes in the stroke volume after fluid administration during pneumoperitoneum combined with the Trendelenburg position.
PLOS
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果