Variability in net ecosystem exchange from hourly to inter-annual time scales at adjacent pine and hardwood forests: a wavelet analysis

PC Stoy, GG Katul, MBS Siqueira, JY Juang… - Tree …, 2005 - academic.oup.com
Tree Physiology, 2005academic.oup.com
Orthonormal wavelet transformation (OWT) is a computationally efficient technique for
quantifying underlying frequencies in nonstationary and gap-infested time series, such as
eddy-covariance-measured net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE). We employed OWT to
analyze the frequency characteristics of synchronously measured and modeled NEE at
adjacent pine (PP) and hardwood (HW) ecosystems. Wavelet cospectral analysis showed
that NEE at PP was more correlated to light and vapor pressure deficit at the daily time scale …
Abstract
Orthonormal wavelet transformation (OWT) is a computationally efficient technique for quantifying underlying frequencies in nonstationary and gap-infested time series, such as eddy-covariance-measured net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE). We employed OWT to analyze the frequency characteristics of synchronously measured and modeled NEE at adjacent pine (PP) and hardwood (HW) ecosystems. Wavelet cospectral analysis showed that NEE at PP was more correlated to light and vapor pressure deficit at the daily time scale, and NEE at HW was more correlated to leaf area index (LAI) and temperature, especially soil temperature, at seasonal time scales. Models were required to disentangle the impacts of environmental drivers on the components of NEE, ecosystem carbon assimilation (Ac) and ecosystem respiration (RE). Sensitivity analyses revealed that using air temperature rather than soil temperature in RE models improved the modeled wavelet spectral frequency response on time scales longer than 1 day at both ecosystems. Including LAI improved RE model fit on seasonal time scales at HW, and incorporating parameter variability improved the RE model response at annual time scales at both ecosystems. Resolving variability in canopy conductance, rather than leaf-internal CO2, was more important for modeling Ac at both ecosystems. The PP ecosystem was more sensitive to hydrologic variables that regulate canopy conductance: vapor pressure deficit on weekly time scales and soil moisture on seasonal to interannual time scales. The HW ecosystem was sensitive to water limitation on weekly time scales. A combination of intrinsic drought sensitivity and non-conservative water use at PP was the basis for this response. At both ecosystems, incorporating variability in LAI was required for an accurate spectral representation of modeled NEE. However, nonlinearities imposed by canopy light attenuation were of little importance to spectral fit. The OWT revealed similarities and differences in the scale-wise control of NEE by vegetation with implications for model simplification and improvement.
Oxford University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果