Wear behaviour of forging steels with different microstructure during dry sliding
Sliding wear behaviour of two types medium carbon microalloyed steels containing various
microstructures was investigated on a 320 mesh SiC paper at a sliding speed of 0.33 m/s
with a load of 6N and sliding duration of 4min under dry sliding conditions (the sliding
distance, 80m). The experimental results showed that the different microstructures cause a
great influence on the wear resistance performance of the steels. Water quenched samples
with martensite structure have the highest hardness and wear resistance performance. That …
microstructures was investigated on a 320 mesh SiC paper at a sliding speed of 0.33 m/s
with a load of 6N and sliding duration of 4min under dry sliding conditions (the sliding
distance, 80m). The experimental results showed that the different microstructures cause a
great influence on the wear resistance performance of the steels. Water quenched samples
with martensite structure have the highest hardness and wear resistance performance. That …
Sliding wear behaviour of two types medium carbon microalloyed steels containing various microstructures was investigated on a 320 mesh SiC paper at a sliding speed of 0.33m/s with a load of 6N and sliding duration of 4min under dry sliding conditions (the sliding distance, 80m). The experimental results showed that the different microstructures cause a great influence on the wear resistance performance of the steels. Water quenched samples with martensite structure have the highest hardness and wear resistance performance. That is because, water cooled samples contained higher amount of carbon in the solid solution. On the other hand, air or sand cooling from forging temperature results in a decrement of hardness and wear resistance in steel-1 and steel-2. However, air cooled samples showed slightly higher wear resistance than sand cooled samples due to finer grain sizes and the larger pearlite and/or precipitation contributions.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果