Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) after
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on subsequent in-lab interventional management …

Background Although physiology‐based assessment of coronary artery stenosis using
instantaneous wave‐free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are established …

Background: Whether the benefit in quality of life (QOL) after percutaneous coronary
intervention depends on the severity of the stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve …

Aims Although lesions deferred revascularization following fractional flow reserve (FFR)
assessment have a low risk of adverse cardiac events, variability in risk for deferred lesion …

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred
from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or …

Aims There are limited data on the clinical implications of total physiologic atherosclerotic
burden assessed by invasive physiologic studies in patients with coronary artery disease …

Background—Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is well established for patients undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention, yet little is known about candidates for coronary artery …

Background Intracoronary physiology is increasingly used in nonculprit stenoses of patients
with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, evidence regarding the safety of fractional …

Coronary lesions of intermediate severity often cause ischemia, and fractional flow reserve
(FFR)-guided revascularization for these coronary lesions is safe and effective. FFR derived …

In recent years, concerns have been raised about the appropriateness of performing
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. 1 …