[PDF][PDF] Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported overdentures

S Cakarer, T Can, M Yaltirik, C Keskin - Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2011 - academia.edu
Background: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the complications associated
with the different attachments used in implant-supported overdentures, including prosthetic …

A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems

C Karabuda, M Yaltrk, M Bayraktar - Implant dentistry, 2008 - journals.lww.com
Objectives: The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the prosthetic complications of
patients with 2 to 4 implants splinted with a round bar or with 2 to 4 unsplinted implants with …

Five‐year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures

CM Cristache, LAS Muntianu… - Clinical oral implants …, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
Objective The objective is to compare, in a prospective randomized clinical trial, three types
of attachment systems for mandibular implant overdenture, focusing on costs, maintenance …

Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.

G Krennmair, R Seemann, A Fazekas… - … Journal of Oral & …, 2012 - search.ebscohost.com
Purpose: To determine patient satisfaction and preference for implant-supported mandibular
overdentures (IOD) retained with ball or Locator attachments. In addition, peri-implant …

Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review.

M Andreiotelli, W Att, JR Strub - International Journal of …, 2010 - search.ebscohost.com
Purpose: Problems associated with a complete denture, such as lack of stability and
retention, can be solved with the use of implant-retained or implant-supported overdentures …

[PDF][PDF] Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.

AGT Payne, YF Solomons - International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2000 - academia.edu
Purpose: A prospective study on mandibular implant-supported overdentures using more
than 2 Brånemark implants splinted with multiple round bars evaluated a hypothesis that …

A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two‐implant overdentures: One‐year report

WK Kleis, PW Kämmerer, S Hartmann… - … implant dentistry and …, 2010 - Wiley Online Library
Background: There is a lack of clinical studies on the self‐aligning attachment system
(Locator®; Zest Anchors, Inc. homepage, Escondido, CA, USA) for two‐implant‐retained …

Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.

VC Petropoulos, W Smith - International Journal of Oral & …, 2002 - search.ebscohost.com
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the retention and stability of the Nobel
Biocare standard ball (NBS), Nobel Biocare 2.25-mm-diameter ball (NB2), Zest Anchor (ZA) …

In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.

P Eren Türk, O Geckili, Y Türk… - … Journal of Oral & …, 2014 - search.ebscohost.com
Purpose: To compare the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments during 5,000
insertion-separation cycles, corresponding to approximately 4.5 years of clinical use …

Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review

T Trakas, K Michalakis, K Kang, H Hirayama - Implant dentistry, 2006 - journals.lww.com
This article presents a comparison between different attachment systems used to retain and
support maxillary and mandibular overdentures in completely edentulous patients. A …