Background Several single-center studies have reported excellent outcomes with minimally
invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR). Although criticized as requiring more …

Objective Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has been demonstrated as a
safe and effective option but remains underused. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of isolated …

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: how does this p... : Current Opinion in Cardiology
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: how does this perform in high-risk patients …

OBJECTIVES To compare early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
versus full sternotomy (FS) isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS We …

Background Limited data exist studying the outcomes of the 2 minimally invasive aortic valve
replacement (AVR) strategies—mini-sternotomy (AVR-st) and right anterior thoracotomy …

Background Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mAVR) is increasingly preferred
over conventional AVR (cAVR). However, data comparing these procedures present …

AIM: Data on the impact of minimally invasive approach on clinical outcomes after isolated
aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) are limited and somewhat controversial. The aim of the …

Background: Right mini-thoracotomy and partial sternotomy are widely recognized as
effective approaches in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim of this …

Background Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (mini AVR) is a safe and effective
treatment option at many hospital centers, but there has not been widespread adoption of …

Background This study compares outcomes of conventional and less-invasive (LI)
approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR) using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons …