Purpose Economic evaluations of mental health interventions often measure health benefit
in terms of utility values derived from the EQ-5D. For the five-level version of the EQ-5D …

Background Many intervention-based studies aiming to improve mental health do not
include a multi-attribute utility instrument (MAUI) that produces quality-adjusted life-years …

Economic evaluations of healthcare interventions increasingly measure outcomes using
quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The SF-6D and the EQ-5D are alternative ways of …

Various preference‐based measures of health are available for use as an outcome measure
in cost–utility analysis. The aim of this study is to compare two such measures EQ‐5D and …

Objectives This study aimed to explore quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and subsequent
cost-effectiveness estimates based on the more physical health–focused EQ-5D 5-level …

Background Most health economic evaluations in mental care include outcome measures
aimed at specific aspects of health, like symptom improvement, functional improvement and …

BackgroundMany clinical studies including mental health interventions do not use a health
state utility instrument, which is essential for producing quality-adjusted life years. In the …

Background Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life
measures may fall short in adequately measuring and valuing the benefits of mental health …

Purpose Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly collected in trials and
some care settings, but preference-based PROMs required for economic evaluation are …

Background Mapping has been used to convert scores from condition-specific measures
into utility scores, and to produce estimates of cost-effectiveness. We sought to compare the …