Abstract Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's controversial article 'After‐Birth Abortion:
Why Should the Baby Live?'has received a lot of criticism since its publishing. Part of the …

Scholars have offered various critiques of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's
controversial article,'After‐birth abortion: Why should the baby live?'My book The Ethics of …

In a recent paper, Giubilini and Minerva argue for the moral permissibility of what they call
'after-birth abortion', or infanticide. Here I suggest that they actually employ a confusion of …

Mary Anne Warren provides a well‐known defense of the liberal position in the abortion
debate, yet her argument is subject to the objection that it implies that infanticide is morally …

In their controversial paper 'After-birth abortion', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide ('after …

There are various ways of attempting to defend an extreme liberal view on abortion,
according to which a woman always has the right to control what happens inside her own …

I argued in 'Pro‐life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing'that
arguments presented by pro‐life philosophers are mistaken and cannot show infanticide to …

In their paper'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'Alberto Giubilini and Francesca
Minerva argue that because there are no significant differences between a fetus and a …

The above paper by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva has stirred up a flurry of
disturbing responses. While the very question posed in the title may be offensive to some …

The argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns is a challenge to liberal
positions on abortion because it can be considered a reductio of their defence of abortion …