In a recent paper, Giubilini and Minerva argue for the moral permissibility of what they call
'after-birth abortion', or infanticide. Here I suggest that they actually employ a confusion of …

In their controversial paper 'After-birth abortion', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide ('after …

In their paper'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'Alberto Giubilini and Francesca
Minerva argue that because there are no significant differences between a fetus and a …

The argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns is a challenge to liberal
positions on abortion because it can be considered a reductio of their defence of abortion …

Giubilini and Minerva argue that the permissibility of abortion entails the permissibility of
infanticide. Proponents of what we refer to as the Birth Strategy claim that there is a morally …

This paper is a response to a recent paper by Bobier and Omelianchuk in which they argue
that the critics of Giubilini and Minerva's defence of infanticide fail to adequately justify a …

This is a response to Giubilini and Minerva arguing that, on the basis of the similar moral
status of the fetus and infant, infanticide is justifiable for many of the same reasons that justify …

Abstract Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's controversial article 'After‐Birth Abortion:
Why Should the Baby Live?'has received a lot of criticism since its publishing. Part of the …

In'After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
challenge the widely-held belief that the moral status of newborn infants differs from that of …

In 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?', Giubilini and Minerva argue that
infanticide should be permitted for the same reasons as abortion. In particular, they argue …