Purpose: To our knowledge factors affecting the adoption of noncurative initial management
in the United States for low risk prostate cancer on a population based level are unknown …

Background Management for men aged≤ 55 years with low‐risk prostate cancer (LRPC) is
debated given quality‐of‐life implications with definitive treatment versus the potential …

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on long-term outcomes among men with prostate cancer
(PCa) from population-based cohorts incorporating information on clinical risk category …

Purpose Early intervention for prostate cancer is associated with excellent long-term
survival, but many affected men, especially those with low-risk disease characteristics, might …

Background: Evidence-based consensus guidelines recommend only observation for men
with low-risk prostate cancer and life expectancy less than 10 years. This report describes …

Background Expectant management (EM) has been widely recommended for men with low-
risk prostate cancers (PCa). We evaluated trends in EM and the sociodemographic and …

Current guidelines recommend conservative management as the preferred option for most
low-risk prostate cancer cases, with certain possible exceptions (age< 55 yr, African …

Objectives This study aimed to describe national trends in presentation, management, and
outcomes for men with high risk prostate cancer. Methods Data were abstracted from …

Conservative management, specifically with active surveillance (AS), has emerged as the
preferred approach for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). We evaluated the trend for …

Abstract The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) concluded that
radical prostatectomy (RP) offered no survival benefit compared with observation in men …